One would think that all you need to read to understand what is a persuasive essay is the name of this type of assignment. And although it does explain something, there’s more to learn. Clearly, the goal of writing a persuasive essay is to convince readers of the advantages of one opinion on a particular issue over the other. But, as with most any academic paper, there are the persuasive essay structure and rules your teacher or professor expects you to follow. Let’s discuss how to start a persuasive essay, what its main elements are, and what you should include supporting your position. Naturally, you need to start with an introduction, which should contain a hook, the issue under discussion, and your thesis statement. The latter is supposed to present your point of view in an easy-to-grasp manner. Next, come the body paragraphs. Their number may vary depending on the essay requirements you got, but there is a common plan for how to write a persuasive essay. Whatever topic you have, dedicate one paragraph to one key aspect and explore that idea. In these paragraphs, you should provide evidence and arguments that support your position. Sometimes it may be necessary to mention the counterpoints you could expect and refute them. Finally, there comes the conclusion paragraph. Do not try to retell everything you wrote before but bring up those ideas you think are the most powerful in convincing the reader that the side you chose is the right one. Now that you know how to write a persuasive essay, if not, you can read about it in this article. Let’s tackle another problem, which is finding persuasive essay topics. Actually, there's no difficulty in that, as all you have to do is do a quick search on the Internet to get a list of possible ideas. Pay attention, though: not just any topic will be good for your essay. Choose something you have an interest in discussing and something that can provoke different opinions. You might even want to borrow a topic from one of the examples of a persuasive essay we've prepared for you.
Why Marriage Is Better Than Being Single
More and more people question the need to get married. We are talking both about official marriage and simply starting to live together with a person you have a romantic relationship with. Data shows that both those options have significantly more benefits than living alone. Single people are statistically less wealthy, healthy, and live shorter lives, so it’s highly advisable to reconsider your relationship status. Marriage has positive effects on a couple's health, and it was proven in the course of 35 studies, conducted by Roberto Manfredini, a professor of Internal Medicine at the University of Ferrara in Italy, and his colleagues. The results of their global study of 1.2 million subjects were published in the Journal of Women's Health in 2017, showing that marriage reduces risk factors and is associated with better health. This is a logical result, because on average, married people have a steady diet, check their health more often, and have physical fitness more regularly. Married couples also tend to be wealthier than single people. One could argue that it all depends on a person’s skills, place of work, productivity, and the ability to plan their budget. However, there are some obvious advantages single people just don’t have. First of all, married people save a lot of money because they buy certain things for both of them rather than for each other. As such, they only need one fridge, one dishwasher, and so on. Next, they can share insurance and pay lower taxes due to being married. Having children helps even more in this regard. As we can see, even studies prove that marriage is very beneficial to people. When compared to singletons, they have increased health, which also results in longer life, and better chances to save up money. Surely, a single life also has some undeniable advantages, but better health and longevity are not something easily disregarded.
Benefits of Having Silent Prayer Time in School
Although the citizens of the United States now follow more than one religion (or none at all), the advocates of religious beliefs suggest that children’s day in school should begin with a silent prayer time. Many see that as a violation of the freedom of conscience, yet this practice may have positive consequences for everyone if implemented properly. Children are very susceptible, and trying to impose certain thoughts and beliefs upon them could result in psychological problems later on. Besides, parents see public school as a place where their kids should get an education and learn to socialize, not be made to pray to God. However, those things are not necessarily mutually exclusive, as long as the right approach is used. If a teacher does not sound too authoritative and simply announces five free minutes, suggesting that pupils say their prayers, meditate, or recollect good things from the previous day, that would not only be appropriate, but even useful.
Children should be offered the freedom of choice, the end goal being that they indulge in positive thinking. The researchers at Mayo Clinic have already proven that it increases one’s life span, lowers rates of stress, results in a better psychological and physical condition, and so on.
Besides, even if a child does not share the same religious beliefs with the rest of the class, he or she can benefit from these silent prayers time by learning to respect other people's beliefs. Teachers can help them to use the available time for being tolerant towards others and adopting positive thinking rather than criticizing or mocking others.
Despite many opposed to the practice of starting a school day with a silent prayer time, there are more benefits than damage from it if held properly. Children should be allowed to do what they choose in these five minutes, but they should all be guided to experience positive thinking.
Besides the positive effect on health and mental condition, this approach can help them develop very useful social skills like tolerance and respect for other people.
Torture Should Not Be Used Under Any Circumstances
While every sound-minded person will agree that torture is wrong, some will also point out that there are times when it's acceptable. Of course, they think it should be an option for the government to use against some dangerous terrorists to save many innocent lives.
However, this sounds like a cheap appeal to emotions, and there are just not enough arguments in favor of resorting to this medieval practice.
First of all, torture is simply against the law. The 8th Amendment of the Constitution, the Geneva Conventions, The United Nations Convention Against Torture – all these documents state that torture is not acceptable and that no human being should be subject to it. Everyone wants to be sure that they live in a country with a fair judicial system, and no inhuman methods will be used against them.
The supporters of torture, or enhanced interrogation techniques as it is often called to make it seem legal, usually believe that using these methods can help to prevent tragic consequences.
However, these techniques should not be relied on. In some cases, people will agree to anything to make the pain stop. If interrogators go too far, the tortured person can become unresponsive to pain and simply shut down.
Those who think that there are special cases in which torture is acceptable should learn more about its effectiveness. Once it is used as an exception, it gets to be used more often on a regular basis, without bringing any real results.
Besides, answers received under torture often cannot be relied on and don't help to learn the truth. The world has shown its position on torture by prohibiting it in the documents drawn-up to protect human rights. Giving it alternative names does not change its nature and makes it neither legal nor justified.